What You Keep Avoiding Together

Welcome to Sync & Thrive, the bi-weekly newsletter helping couples strengthen their relationship through shared health. Every Friday, we share real-life reflections and actionable insights. If you were forwarded this message, sign up here.

👋 Happy Friday Ladies and Gents,

I have been afraid of putting myself out there, and I have been doing it anyway.

There is a kind of validation that comes when you realize your instinct was right all along. It is followed almost immediately by frustration with yourself, for every week you held back. You knew what needed to happen. You had the idea, the capability, the vision. But what you were missing was a process for moving through the fear that was sitting between you and the doing.

That is where I have been. Working through it, building the process, moving forward with the knowledge that I am the variable I am responsible for.

For decades, skincare has focused on aesthetic results. But we started by asking a different question: what if instead of trying to preserve our skin's youth, we prioritized optimizing our skin's function? That's how Aramore’s  NAD+ skincare was born.

Developed by Harvard & MIT scientists, Aramore is a skincare system based on skin’s performance, not just its appearance. NAD+ production slows down significantly as we age, and this causes all the telltale science of aging. 

Aramore is the only skincare formulated to help skin produce NAD+ like much younger skin would. The result? Skin that’s stronger, firmer,  and more resilient, that not only looks better, but stays healthier over time.

Get 20% off your first order with code NEWSLETTER20.

Shop Now & Save

If that resonates, whether it is about your health, your relationship, your business, or what you have been telling yourself you will start next month, this edition is for you. If your partner has ever seemed stuck in a way you could not explain or shift, this may be the most useful framework you share with them this week.

Here is what most couples never make each other aware of: both partners feel fear, but fear rarely shows up as fear. It shows up as the voice in your head you cannot quiet, the low-grade tension that sits in your body and raises your baseline, the irritability that comes out sideways at your partner when the thing you are actually anxious about has nothing to do with them. Your nervous system is running a threat response, and your partner is catching the output. By the time it becomes a two-person problem, the original fear is buried under the friction it created. You are now arguing about the symptom while the cause goes unnamed.

That is what these two frameworks are designed to interrupt.

Tim Ferriss describes the fear-setting process as a way to separate what you can control from what you cannot. That distinction matters because most of what we fear lives in the category of things we have been treating as fixed when they are not.

The thing you are afraid of, the conversation, the commitment, the launch, the gym, the decision you keep circling, almost never plays out as badly as the version your brain has been rehearsing. The imagination runs worst-case scenarios on a loop and presents them as certainty. Fear setting interrupts that loop by forcing the imagination to be specific, and those fears are almost always survivable.

The core idea is anchored in a line by Jerzy Gregorek:

Every time you avoid the conversation your relationship needs, the health standard you keep lowering, the decision you have been circling for months, you are making the easy choice.

The easy choice compounds, and six months of easy choices build a life that feels increasingly out of your control. Fear setting is how you stop making the easy choice by default.

A 2022 meta-analysis of 31 randomized controlled trials (over 4,000 participants) found that writing fears and anxieties down specifically produced small yet significant, lasting reductions in anxiety and stress. The effect built over time and was strongest when the writing happened in short, consistent intervals.

We have both done this separately and together. We noticed that it is a different mental process for each of us. Aaron moves through it quicker, while I sit longer in the repair column. Either way, the fear gets smaller the moment it becomes specific.

Here is the process that made that possible.

This three-page written exercise works because it forces the imagination to be specific. Vague fears compound in the dark, and when written down, well…they shrink. How so? The exercise does not make the fear disappear. It makes it manageable because you can now respond to the actual thing rather than the version your imagination has been running.

Page One: Define

Write the fear or anxiety at the top of the page. Start with “What if I...” and finish the sentence with whatever has been occupying your thinking or sitting with you longer than it should.

What if I openly expressed what I want and need from my spouse in a kind and respectful way? What if we finally sat down and planned out our year together? What if I asked my partner to join me at the gym this week? Put them down. They all belong on this page. Then draw three columns underneath it.

“What if I…”

By the time you finish page one, most fears have already shrunk because they are specific, and now have solutions.

Page Two: Benefits

This is the page where most people surprise themselves. You have been stress-testing the downside. Now’s the time to give the upside the same honesty.

Keep in mind, you are not writing the perfect outcome. You are writing the benefits of a base hit. You are looking for what you would gain from finally doing the thing you have been avoiding the longest.

What if it is being consistent with breathwork to help with your stress levels, or hitting those protein targets with each meal? What if it is having that hard conversation with your spouse that you keep putting off for a better week? What would you have, even from an imperfect first try? Write that. Keep writing until you cannot anymore. Most people find the list gets longer than they expected.

When you give the potential gains the same detailed attention you gave the worst-case scenarios, the risk-reward picture almost always looks different from the version fear was presenting.

Page Three: Cost of Inaction

This is the page that tends to change people.

Draw three columns and label them: 6 months, 1 year, 3 years. Under each one, answer this question in as much detail as you can:

If I avoid this action and decisions like it, what does my life look like at that point?

Will you be emotionally spent, physically unhealthy, financially stagnant, and disconnected from the person you chose to build a life with?

The Cost of Inaction

What most people find when they complete this page is that the fear of doing the thing is considerably smaller than the cost of continuing not to do it, once both are written out side by side with equal honesty.

Oz Pearlman is one of the most successful mentalists in the world. He started at 14, walking up to strangers at Italian restaurants, four foot nothing, asking if he could show them a trick.

The rejection rate was high, and the stakes felt enormous to a teenager with no agent and no reputation.

His solution was not to care less. It was to create a cognitive separation.

He became “O’s the Magician”. When someone rejected him, they were not rejecting Oz Pearlman; they were rejecting the act, and the act could always improve. He was able to take the negativity and place it on a character they did not know, which meant it never had to land on him personally. He describes this as truly transformative, and what it produced was the ability to focus entirely on goals without being derailed by rejection or the fear of it.

Sam Parr has his own version of this, which he calls “The Machine”. The alter ego is not a costume or a performance. It is a specific identity you construct for the moments when your default self would stop. It carries different beliefs, different postures, and a different relationship with rejection. You step into it the way an athlete steps onto a court.

The fear does not disappear. It simply does not belong to the version of you that is doing the thing.

For couples, this framework matters for a specific reason. The lower-agency partner often reads the high-agency partner as naturally more confident, more fearless, more constitutionally bold. They do not see the process underneath. They do not know about the alter ego, the fear setting exercise, or the intentional work that makes forward motion possible.

When you show your partner that you are not fearless, that you have an alter ego because you needed one and built it deliberately, you give them something more useful than encouragement. You give them the process, and it's something they can build for themselves.

Do the fear setting exercise. Pick the fear that has been sitting longest, the decision you keep circling, the conversation you keep scheduling for a better week.

Then, if your partner is open to it, sit down and do one together on a shared fear you have both been avoiding. You will learn something about each other in that hour that a year of comfortable conversations would not have surfaced.

Remember: easy choices, hard life.

We built the 7-Day Sync Plan for exactly this. The first hard choice is usually the hardest. → Sync Quiz™

Now go slay your fears, and enjoy the weekend!

💛 Jaylene & Aaron, Sync & Thrive Team

P.S. New here? Start with the Sync Quiz™ to see where you and your partner are aligned or out of sync across: movement, connection, fuel, and resilience →

If there’s a dynamic in your relationship you’d like us to explore, send us a note at [email protected]. Many of our best topics start with reader conversations.

Most of what we write about lives inside four everyday areas of life together: how we move, how we eat, how we connect, and how we reset.