This website uses cookies

Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.

In partnership with

Welcome to Sync & Thrive, the bi-weekly newsletter helping couples strengthen their relationship through shared health. Every Friday, we share real-life reflections and actionable insights. If you were forwarded this message, sign up here.

Inside The Lab:

👋 Welcome back Ladies and Gents,

We were sitting at the kitchen table having coffee when Aaron said, "I gotta read you something." 

He began reading about an entrepreneur who hit it big within the tech and design space. This wasn't his bio; it was a newsletter he wrote about the dissolution of his marriage. The experience was liberating and awesome because of 'everything that came after.'

I found myself getting irritated and jotted down a few things in my notebook while Aaron was reading it to me:

  • High-agency with Low-agency relationship??? 

  • Not emotionally regulated?

  • Own trauma?

  • Selfish?

I kept coming back to that first bullet point. Oftentimes, the most successful people in business have the lowest agency relationships. 

However, is the partner always the low-agency one? 

I kept returning to this question. What if you could be high-agency in output, but low-agency with your emotions?

I did a quick search online: the entrepreneur's name + parents to see what would come up. I was curious what his parents did, and if they were divorced or still married. Come to find out, his parents are no longer married. They had a pretty argumentative marriage over finances, and neither of them was happy. All of this led their entrepreneurial son to leave home at an early age, foster extreme independence, and no doubt be in search of something to make him happy.

I asked Aaron to forward the email to me so I could read it.

While I was reading it, this surprised me: "We had years of genuine love and laughter. I became who I am in part because of that relationship."

So there was love. What happened?

What happens when "just moisturizer" isn't cutting it anymore?

Most moisturizers are doing one job: hydrating your skin. But hydration alone isn't enough to stop your skin from changing over time. The appearance of fine lines and dullness increase, and the skincare routine that worked at 35 may not be delivering the same results a decade or two later.

That's not a coincidence — with age, the cellular processes driving visible skin aging accelerate in ways that hydration alone can't keep pace with. Most skincare was never designed to address that. OS-01 FACE was.

Developed by longevity scientists after more than a decade of research, it's the first topical designed to address a leading driver of visible skin aging — not just the symptoms of it. Clinically shown to improve visible firmness in 96% of users and the appearance of wrinkles in 87% in just 12 weeks.

Real skincare science, designed for your skin at every age.

*Explore the claims at oneskin.co

High agency, low regulation

He went on to say that it wasn't anything dramatic. They just changed. Grew into different people. Their interests and preferences weren't the same, and they didn't 'like having their lives intertwined.' 

Which I think is so sad.

When I read this, I thought: yes, high-agency entrepreneurs can be low-agency in their emotional regulation.

I did a quick search: Can you be high-agency in output and low-agency with emotional regulation? This is what I found: 

An interesting inverse listed is Gordon Ramsay whose on-screen persona is about transforming failing businesses, while screaming and swearing at restaurant owners and employees to get their stuff together. What we see today…a completely different man. A man who seems to be self-regulated with no extreme blow-ups, a devoted, loving husband and father.

Regarding that entrepreneur, I realize that I only have bits of information pieced together. Is it possible I was reading through the lines? Maybe. But what I do know started to make sense to me.

Did they grow apart from each other? Yes. Could this have been avoided? Also, yes.

What looked like growing apart has a biological explanation running underneath it the entire time. 

When a relationship lives in an unresolved state, the body treats it as a chronic threat. Relational uncertainty produces increased cortisol reactivity and disrupts cortisol recovery. The body doesn't know the difference between an unresolved business problem and an unresolved marriage. It just stays activated.

Aaron and I have a different outlook.

We made an agreement to “do life together” whatever happens. We love each other and are committed to each other until death do us part. We love being together and experiencing new things together. But in looking at this entrepreneur's example, we see what would have helped his relationship.

We don't have all the answers.

What we have is over twenty years of choosing each other, watching others navigate this, and being honest enough to look at our own deficiencies. We aren’t tooting our own horn. This is what happens when you stay committed to figuring it out together.

So what was actually missing?

Subscribe to keep reading

This content is free, but you must be subscribed to Sync & Thrive to continue reading.

I consent to receive newsletters via email. Terms of use and Privacy policy.

Already a subscriber?Sign in.Not now

Keep Reading